Question 8365: priority at junction

Plaats een reactie

Bevestigingscode

Typ enkel de gevraagde letters over. De code is niet hoofdlettergevoelig en bevat enkel letters.

Bevestigingscode
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen:

BBCode staat AAN
[img] staat AAN
[url] staat AAN
Smilies staan AAN

Voorafgaande berichten
   

Weergave uitklappen Voorafgaande berichten: Question 8365: priority at junction

Re: Question 8365: priority at junction

door Rafael » 02 nov 2016, 19:53

But the fact is the black car has to give way, it should not enter the junction when it is not safe and he can not clear the junction without blocking other cars.

Regarding the cyclist crossing: this does not mean a cyclist can/should "throw" himself in front of a car thinking "i have priority as soon as i am on the crossing".

Re: Question 8365: priority at junction

door Blues » 02 nov 2016, 19:27

Hi Rafael,
Thanks for the reply.
I'm thinking of this as being analogous to the cyclist crossing. A cyclist has to give priority to the car when passing the cyclist crossing, unless it is already on the crossing. So the black car could have started moving onto the junction when the yellow car was sufficiently far away. Is this argument and analogy valid?
Best

Re: Question 8365: priority at junction

door Rafael » 02 nov 2016, 14:34

So if you were the yellow car, you would be fine making an emergency stop because of the black car?

Question 8365: priority at junction

door Blues » 02 nov 2016, 14:04

Hi,
I don’t understand why the black car shouldn’t have priority? It is already at the junction. If the car was before the pedestrian crossing then yes, the yellow car. Appreciate your comment on this.

Best

Omhoog